Sunday, March 17, 2019
Frankenstein as a Symbol of Struggle Between Enlightened and Romantic P
Potential explanations or answers to current philosophical quandarys are very much presented through tempor ally relevant works of literature. The Romantic Era of the deep eighteenth and early nineteenth century is characterized as a quantify in history in which aristocratic social and political norms of the savant Era were radically investigated and questioned. For Enlightened thinkers, the idea of macrocosm was composed of triad essential parts, the true, the beautiful, and the good. Isaac atomic number 7s contri aloneions to scientific method were fascinating in the respect that they seemed to provide truths regarding quantitative matter. Yet his science failed to provide us with knowledge of all qualitative matters, such as ethics and aesthetics. With Newtons laws held in such high regard, the model of being was decomposed to solely the true, or scientific knowledge which is recognized and corroborate through his laws of motion, motion to exclude all matters which Newto ns lens could not be pointed. It is obvious that problems would arise as a result of Newtons advancements. Qualitative matters could not be explained through Newtons science, creating a sense of bewilderment. People began to question whether certain quantitative matters actually pertained to all aspects of life. Rousseau, whose writings contributed immensely to Romanticism, proposes a new model of being, which is later confirmed by Kant and Schiller. His new model strengthened the enlightened ideas of being, and allowed for the application of being to both the quantitative and qualitative. Mary Shelleys Frankenstein provides an explanation to the struggle everywhere true being between Enlightened and Romantic thinkers while exemplify Romantic thought on pursuing p... ...he significance of the philosophical dilemma between Enlightened and Romantic thinkers is exemplified through Mary Shelleys Frankenstein. This emblematical literary work provides readers with insight to the probl em philosophers of the time faced when relations with the idea of true being. Through the monster, the townspeople, and Walton, we are able to gain a complete understanding of the situation Rousseau, Kant, and Schiller dealt with. In the end, it is clear that in severalize to experience true being and beauty one must not rely solely on Newtons scientific lens, but must also understand the quantitative matters such as morals and ethics. Works CitedRousseau, Jean-Jacques, Angela Scholar, and Patrick Coleman. Confessions. Oxford Oxford UP, 2000. Print.Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Joseph Pearce. Frankenstein. San Francisco Ignatius, 2008. Print.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.