Compare Dulce et decorum est by Wilfred Owen, and Before Agincourt Essa

Comp atomic number 18 Dulce et decorousness est by Wilfred Owen, and Before Agincourt by William Shakespeare.Before Agincour and Dulce et decorum est========================================I have chosen to oppose two poesys for this piece of work, and theyare Dulce et decorum est by Wilfred Owen, and Before Agincourt byWilliam Shakespeare. Both look at War as the main subject, but expressvery several(predicate) views on it. Wilfred Owen has written a very powerfulpoem approximately a man dying from a gas attack during the runner World War,whereas Shakespeare writes a rhetoric poem virtually the honour and presumptionfound in meshing.Dulce et decorum est, and Before Agincourt are two poems soincredibly far away, in meaning, from each other, that it is verydifficult to compare them. The one big difference is their attitudetowards war. Wilfred Owen has actually been in a war. He saw what hewrote about. He was there, as the writing is his thoughts andfeelings. Shakespeare wasnt in the war he wrote about. He wroteabout it after it happened, any as a way to boost morale in Englandat the time of the Spanish Armada for Queen Elizabeth, or because theywere his own views on War. This battle did actually happen, but Henrydidnt say these dustup, Shakespeare but govern them in his mouth.Owens poem is concrete. It happened and was real. He knows whathes public lecture about because he was there and went through it all.Shakespeares poem is airy. Its abstract and doesnt appear tomean anything. At a outgrowth glance its just men talking, but when youread it properly you essay that it is far more than that. Henry believesso much in what hes saying that hes prepared to die for it. Itsa very spiritual poem, in that it is not earthed, o... ...y using wordssuch as guttering, hoots and gargling.Shakespeare used no similes either, but Owen did, writing hardening double, like old beggars under sacks.In conclusion, I enjoyed Owens poem much more than I didShakespeares. I felt that Before Agincourt was boring. I didntlike the lack of tension, action and drama. I thought that it justwent on and on around the same idea, that the language was flowery andas well old fashioned for me. Although both poems were repetitive, whenDulce et decorum est repeated words, it really beat themessage home, but when Before Agincourt repeated the same idea, itjust world-weary me. I felt that Owens poem less boring because it was riotous paced. It really happened and the images it described were vividand in your face. So, I would definitely root on Owens poem toanyone, and I did really enjoy writing about it.